Further to our article, Top 5 Tips for increasing sales using Bulk SMS, one of our customers RoughTrax (a mail order supplier of Toyota Hilux parts) decided to follow our Number 1 Tip …. follow-up text messages to customers after a sale.
We asked Barry Hemmings, Director at RoughTrax how it worked for him and these are the figures he gave us;
- We send out around 1,000 orders a week and followed up each an every sale 2 days after delivery with a text.
- At 1,000 per week, using Text Marketer’s Bulk SMS system, it cost just £37+VAT
- About 10% of the customers we sent a text to called back up and made additional orders.
- RESULT: 19.23% increase in the total sales value of those customers we sent the text to – Fantastic!
There are other advantages to doing this too – positive word of mouth increases when you follow up a sale with a thank you message – resulting in more sales from brand new customers.
RoughTrax sent the following message, “Thank you for your recent order. If you need anything in addition within 7 days we will give you a 5% discount. Regards, RoughTrax. 0117 986 9065.”.
Why not test the same concept on a group of your customers for a few weeks and see if you can achieve the same fabulous results? Get a free Bulk SMS account and why not try it on your customers ? If you had a 19% sales value increase from your customers and more positive word of mouth, would it be worth it?
- Is there such a thing as ‘quality’ in Bulk SMS?
There are a vast number of different ‘gateways’ that bulk SMS service providers can use to connect to the UK...
- SMS Marketing 101 – Database Segmentation
Competition for attention in todays SMS marketing world is increasing all the time. To increase the relevancy, deliver more value...
- How to use an SMS Gateway
Our SMS Gateway is extremely powerful indeed. It allows companies to connect to our systems and send out messages 1...
- How can you benefit from our free SMS keyword and shortcode text response system?
Ever seen a TV Ad’ that says, “Text BROCHURE to 69888 for more details”? Why do they do this instead...